Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)

In the very early morning of July 12, 2012, an ALERT message had caught my attention about the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on Twitter. I have never heard of of this CRPD and I have first response and mention about this topic on my blog. The message was about for us to support and ask our states Senator to ratify this CRPD before the Senate attend to a hearing where the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee would hold a hearing on Thursday, July 12, at 9:00 a.m. at the Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room G-50. I was able to have time to write a letter to the New York Senator to opposite against it.

Before I have sent via email Senator this letter, I have done some reading about this CRPD thing which I at first though this CRPD thing was a good thing for the disabled people in our country (USA), since I am disabled Deaf in both ears. After I have done a bit more research about this, my result has changed my though. It was NOT NECESSARY having this CRPD idea in our country. It is based on two strong reasons, the first reason was about this American with Disabilities Act (ADA) which we already have since George H. W. Bush had signed this into law in 1990. Secondly, I have discovered what does this Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) mean and where did this CRPD idea come from is not from USA.

This Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities idea I understand came from the international human rights instrument of the United Nations. You can check that two different links that explain all about that here: Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

These two top reasons I have opposite against it when I asked myself a question in mind 'why do we need US/Senator to ratify CRPD while our country are already being recognized as a human civil right for disabilities?' That was after I have also discovered that President Barack Obama had signed an order for the United States to become a signatory to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in July 24, 2009.

I couldn't possibly understand why Barack Obama was into this when our country (USA) are in good responsibly control and protecting every disabled person's life with civil right? Since our country already being recognized as a human civil right for disabilities by this America Disabilities Act (ADA) law, why add or change what George H. W. Bush has already signed this ADA law?

Again, this Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities idea is the international human rights instrument of the United Nations. It is NOT NECESSARY to have another kind of law which we already have for our country and it is NOT NECESSARY a good idea for them to monitors convention us by the United Nations or outside States parties to ensure that we are treating our disabilities people with respect. Since I believe this CRPD idea had violated against our America Disabilities Act law which Bush had signed.

The possible good news was that this CRPD thing may not happen in our country. I have discovered this on the very same day during the late morning that U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations U.N. CRPD was broadcast live from 9am to noon online. I have discovered about this on twitter. I haven't had a chance to watch the beginning of this broadcast live hearing within an hour and a half before the hearing end.

While I have had witness this live broadcast hearing to see whether the Senate would dare ratify the CRPD in our country. It looks like most of the Senate had opposite against it. You can still watch this (Past Live) record closed caption video at their U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations video.

I say this is a good sign so far, because we don't need to have this New World Order idea as well.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVtum0VqUeM&feature=g-all-c]Gary Malkowski on UN CRPD & Oralist Agenda - YouTube[/ame]

Gary Malkowski Message Does Not Prove Enough

TheWhiteTiger said:

Gary Malkowski on UN CRPD & Oralist Agenda - YouTube

Click to expand...

Okay, I have watched the YouTube video which Gary Malkowski explained about the AGB organization against CRPD idea etc..

I have carefully watched several times over to ensure if I understood what the message Gary was delivering. To see what message you were referring to me about.

After I did some research about what did Alexander Graham Bell Association organization had a negative message against the CRPD idea, I am a bit of disappointing to learn the possibilities what AGB were up against the ASL recognition. The message which AGB is against the CRPD idea is much differ than my reason not supporting CRPD. Since, I do want the ASL to be recognized in our Deaf world. Not to mean by having the CRPD to do that for us. We in the Deaf community cross the Americans had already begun building the ASL recognition throughout history. We are continuing doing well with that so far. Look at what Canada and other country have done so far with the Deaf language culture. That is the recognition we the Deaf culture have done so far. Gary message is all about having ASL or Deaf language to be world recognition and what more does he or others want? To have another law by the UN to do that for us? No need, we can have our own law and recognition way to sign the world to know that we have this human civil right.

Gary Malkowski message on the YouTube is not enough to prove me why we in USA should support the CRPD idea. Since the message I have posted against the CRPD idea weight less than what law and history of recognition we have in USA beast this CRPD idea.

So you are against this because the UN came up with it and not someone in the senate or house? If it was the exact same thing but introduced as a bill by a senator would you be for it then?
I guess I see no reason to do twice the work if there is a proposal already out there to accomplish something that we want. I don't care whose idea it was.

Against The New World Order

WillKnit said:

So you are against this because the UN came up with it and not someone in the senate or house? If it was the exact same thing but introduced as a bill by a senator would you be for it then?
I guess I see no reason to do twice the work if there is a proposal already out there to accomplish something that we want. I don't care whose idea it was.

Click to expand...

To clarify what exactly am I against. The one top reason I am against is the U.N. roll, whether they came up with a pretty good idea or not. I would not dare join or be part of the world government system which the U.N. wanted to be responsible for the CRPD system. Do you know anything about what the United Nations do or what kind of system they believe in?

As I have already mentioned earlier far above that the U.N. deal with the New World Order and many people do not know what that means. The New World Order means one world government to rule globalization. One world government control is not the taste I would agree on. I have been far careful to what offer would give us a deal to sound so good to be true. This CRPD idea is one to blind us for the future's sake.

I have found one YouTube video that explain more about the United Nations and the New World Order that many people do not know what the U.N. future goal is:

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiClGkRqQxw&feature=player_detailpage[/ame]

donna lee shelby,great lady in u.n i not sure if she still do represent people with disabilites american ones....outsider you talk like jehova wittness

caz12 said:

donna lee shelby,great lady in u.n i not sure if she still do represent people with disabilites american ones....outsider you talk like jehova wittness

Click to expand...

I don't know who is Donna Lee Shelby. She maybe a good person like some others who work for the U.N. may not know everything what the U.N. really do. Just like there are some good people who are a member in a Church organization who care and help people, whether they are Adventism, Catholicism, Mormonism or Jehovah Witness. They just do not know the whole truth or what kind of church organization they are dealing with.

Just to have you know, I am not Jehovah Witness but am the follower of the Son of the Creator one who made the heaven and earth.