Originally Posted by jillio

Yeah, you go ahead and rest your case. Perhaps one day, you will be as educated and well informed as you actually believe yourself to be.

If you can't see the problems inherent in Scalia's statement, then you really are incapable of critical thinking. No wonder you continue to refer to "statistics" as "data" despite several explanations regarding the difference.

Oh, and when you use specific cases to illustrate your point, and then the links are parsed straight back to the site from which you pulled them, you have most definately used them as a reference. Do you actually think about the stuff you read, or do you just randomly copy it?