Quote:
Originally Posted by owen06
jillio,
I'm not going to play that game with you. You pulled out a very small sample of what Cloggy provided. Likewise, none of those were the longitudinal studies you were claiming were non-existant. You have been provided over and over again valid research, refuse to adress others points, and get very defensive if others critique the research that you provide. Once again, I suggest you read the WHOLE paper, not just the abstract (that only provides an introduction and interest).
You were given the research, you were wrong (and that is ok), cued speech is supported via empirical data.
|
And, as I said, I used a small sample for the sake of space. CS is not supported by empirical data. Not for literacy, and not for communication. Speechreading benefits have found mixed results, and that is only with qualitative data. Likewise, virtually all samples are too small to provide any degree of generalizbility. And to include studies done on hearing college students majoring in communication disorders, and studies done on dysfluency in hearing children does not apply, and is, in fact, misleading.