|
jillio,
I'm not going to play that game with you. You pulled out a very small sample of what Cloggy provided. Likewise, none of those were the longitudinal studies you were claiming were non-existant. You have been provided over and over again valid research, refuse to adress others points, and get very defensive if others critique the research that you provide. Once again, I suggest you read the WHOLE paper, not just the abstract (that only provides an introduction and interest).
You were given the research, you were wrong (and that is ok), cued speech is supported via empirical data.
|