There is an ongoing debate whether to keep the drinking age at 21 or lower it down to 18 for either military personnel or for the general population.
Kentucky, South Carolina and Wisconsin are proposing the drinking age to be lowered to 18 just for the military personnel while Missouri, South Dakota, Vermont and Minnesota are considering the drinking age to be lowered for the general population.
Is it for the military rights or for the general population drinking age rights? Is it fair for the military personnel to be able to get a beer or two while the general population under 21 can't get it?
Please discuss.
Seven states consider lower drinking ages - UPI.com
ABC News: 21's a Bust? States Debate Drinking Age