Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio
And she is quaranteed the right of her day in court to fight the citation. What part of that do you not understand, "barrsiter"?
She didn't manipulate the media, the media sought her out.
Perhaps you consider dying her dog pink to raise awareness for breast cancer "tacky", but your opinion on the tackiness of the act is not an issue. Nor has she been cited for being "tacky". So that is neither here nor there.
I might ask you, what are you doing to raise awareness on any level regarding any issue that affects any gender?
Your personal judgenments regarding the appropriateness of her actions are not an issue here. You are entitled to disagree with her. However, that does not mitigate the fact that she is indeed, entitled to her day in court to fight the application of a law of which the intent had nothing to do with this particular situation.
|
How do you know if the media sought her out?
Secondly what does this have to do with gender? This issue is about a woman that was warned not to dye her pets and she continually ignored the warnings and got fined.
Again, we will see what the judge has to see on April 7th--when she has her day in court.
BTW.....

call me "Byrdie the Barrister". It has a nice ring to it.