03-10-2008, 09:30 AM
|
#102 (permalink)
|
|
Hiiiiiii it's meeeeee
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 25,688
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babyblue
I understand what you are saying but they're a lot of honest people out there that is going to have to pay for the dishonest ones... why charge the faithful couples extra money? When the husband or man has no doubt.. Would you be offended if they made you do it... KNOWING that you are faithful?
I only agree to it if the father suspect it is not his child... and a lot of men do suspect it is not their child... only if the man feels obligated to do so should go ahead... but to make it a law.... I feel it is unnecessary to do so.
Faithful couples going to have to burden the proof, It is ridiculous.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolie_77
I agree, It is not necessary to a point to make it a law. Sure, there are some women out there that are not so faithful but there are others that are so faithful (and knowingly 100%) of a certain man who would be the father.
I think this law is pretty dumb. If the man feels that he is not the father of the child for whatever reasons, let him take a DNA test and if he happens to be on the birth certificate - that simply can be changed with a proof of the DNA test (if he isn't found to be the father). If the man wish to acknowledge the "father" role, then let him sign the birth certificate without a paternity test. I think by dishing out a lot of money just to make a proof because the "supposedly law" says so is just far too extreme and it is like telling us that either we have to dish out the bucks just so we can have the man on the birth certificate. Dumb, isn't it?
Whether the couple is married or not, it is under the assumption that we all do this or that. It doesn't mean that every women are like this.
|
Yes, I agree that it's not necessary to make it a law. Simple demand DNA test if they doubt their paternity. It's their decision, not Government.
__________________
*sniffing you*
|
|
|