Quote:
Originally Posted by jillio
Exactly. There are already measures in place to handle these situations. We don't need to make mandatory paternity testing a law when paternity is not being contested. And, BTW, there are just as many men who deny their paternity to get out of taking responsibility as there are women who lie about paternity. In fact, it is usually the case when a case goes to court that the woman is stating who the father of the child is, and the father is denying it. And remember, the father's DNA sample has to be available to prove paternity.
|
I was thinking - Since it is normally settled in the court requesting a paternity test to clear out the commotion of who the father of the baby is. Why would that proposed bill be in the air when it is already settled in the court? What's the point of having that bill and what good will it do?
If it is just only to collect the DNAs in the database, I just don't see how it is irreverent because DNAs can be obtained in many various ways by donating blood, dental works, urine test, so and on.
Sure, I can understand it is good for a child to know who the father is but I think it also contains that the DNA testings already exists and it normally is ordered in court to clear it out and lay it on the table.