View Single Post
Old 02-02-2008, 03:17 PM   #403 (permalink)
jillio
Registered User
 
jillio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by loml View Post
Cheri- I can see what you are saying, if you are referring to acquiring/learning language through speech only. However, learning the language of your family for a deaf child, imo, is no harder than learning a form of sign (language). I am a cuer of English. I found cueing through my personal experience with the Deaf community, deaf education system, interpreter programs, rehabilitation institutions and the medical system. Cued Speech can/does give a deaf child from a hearing family access to their families language. Myself, I consider this a fabulous gift of early intervention. It is a visual form of, it is kenesthetic and can be auditory, of course depending on the level of hearing loss. As with ASL from a fluent deaf signer, the child can/does recieve and aquire/learn their families language from people who are fluent in that language.

As with any successful aquisition of language, there must be consistency, accuracy and dedication.
You still seem to be confused regarding the difference between acquisition and learning. The very fact that you refer to having "found" cuing is testiment to the fact that it was not a process of aqcquisition, but of learning. While it is possible that CS could be a useful tool for teaching English, it has yet to be supported as a method for acquiring an L1 language.
jillio is offline   Reply With Quote