View Single Post
Old 12-23-2007, 05:33 PM   #73 (permalink)
Yiffzer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 791
oh man. i messed up. i wanted to refer to the book 1984, but i put down 1982. -_- well, if you get the reference, then yay. ;D

no, i don't have a position in eugenics so you won't have much from me.

but for those that cry "this is immoral!" should realize that with technology advancing, we will continue to lose our morals. even though this doesn't make much sense as to why, we still see it. ;D

what to do? do we limit technology growth until we develop our ethics around it? but there's always multiple views on any given thing. one may argue that a disability is a disability, nothing more. to inherit any type of disability is unfavorable. and of course, another would argue that disability provides flavor to life, also allowing us to learn invaluable social skills, etc.

all good points but whatever. i'm an advocate for limiting technology despite i'm majoring in management information systems, lulz. ;D

/offtopic
Yiffzer is offline   Reply With Quote