View Single Post
Old 12-14-2007, 11:35 PM   #247 (permalink)
pek1
Professional Writer.
 
pek1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Minnesota.
Posts: 3,240
Send a message via AIM to pek1 Send a message via MSN to pek1 Send a message via Yahoo to pek1
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grummer View Post
I happen to have anumber of books on training dogs too, as one of them IS soley specifically on hearing dogs too. That presumption is Not neccessary true, in the bulk of Hoffman's book was devoted to temperment selection and its importance was elaborated at breadth and depth; there is no way you can say the author assummes the would-be trainers, hearing dog recipents, hearing dog owners to have no intention to leave the dog home!
I didnt say family pet, that is very different. At that point I am inclined to agree that a family pet is not ideal for the strigent rules and arduous duty set upon the dog. It requires a dog or puppy to be brought up as to fit that particular role as a hearing dog. When I said responsible, I mean of course this is considered as implied, responsibilities doesnt (and shouldn't) have room for sloppy handling.

Ii is maintained before that a hearing dog should be recogised as real, with a difference I just happen to disagree that hearing PEOPLE be doing all the ruling and screening. There should be more flexiablity, and more education so deaf /Deaf people can make actual informed decision about whether they really need a hearing dog or not.

Kaitin has made some wonderfully well-resourced response about confidence, it is not something to downplay, this is real. While I also do see some immature ones but seldom there is much chance for them to bend the rules. I wasnt even condoning this at all, however it should be pointed out that tightening of controls and by-laws regarding animals across the spectrum as been publically witnessed over the recent years, had some undersirable repercusations which seemed to allow some angry people to alter the settings which otherwise would have been suitable and safe to have dogs for such excellent roles. It is sad to see more rules slapped on in response to irresponsible dog-owners or dog-abusers, even sadder that is has gotten more [hearing-dominanted]beaucracticised.

According to proper standard of service dog handling, this is not an issue, it is not unsanitary, when there working dogs are not allowed to eat, but drink water perhaps (I have been offered water for my dog, that was welcomed and caring). I think you just have get over the silly excess of zoonosis.


Yours
Grummer,

I agree with you wholeheartedly! My hearing dog, as I've mentioned several times before, goes nearly everywhere I do and she even gets more complements and even more 'hellos' than I do! I think people know, for the most part, that Snickers is a working dog, regardless of having the cape on or not.

I think that Lantana would go so far as to say that people who wear hearing aids are disgusting, so I think it would be fair to ignore Lantana, wouldn't you say? I think she/he's disgusting. Besides, my hearing dog is cleaner than the vast majority of businesses AND restaurants we patronize. Shoot, I'd go so far as to say she's cleaner than most people are and most definately cleaner than most peoples' children are!

Oh, by the way, did I mention that my dog even acts more professional than people do? You ought to see how many people point and stare at her! My dog, sure as heck, wouldn't be caught dead doing that to someone!
__________________
Pete
pek1 is offline   Reply With Quote