Originally Posted by Reba

Then we agree that claws won't always save a cat's life.



SO? and teeth doesn't save a dog"s life always, and legs doesn't always save a deer's life (for instance from being hit by car) and so on..

but claws DOES save cat's life in many other instances, and I am sure a cat who have claws can run better than a cat who don't have them - for this simple reason that claws help push better from the surface. I had two cats and I could see them using claw while running away.

And claws are not only for saving life.





It's not "forbidden"; it just isn't logical.


On the contrary, it is logical- like human's fingers, cats have many uses for their claws, not only to "save life".

Do we compare neutering animals without their permission with sterilizing humans without their permission? Do we compare selling animals with selling humans?


Fallicious comparison. In wild nature controls animal population, domesticated animals like cats and dogs are reproducing uncontrollably and hence the need for responsible ownership which include castration.
Humans are responsible for themselves - they control their reproduction, and they pay for their existence.