Originally Posted by jillio

Some qualifications there...."learning of language".....the implication and unspoken assumption is "oral language" and "listening"....also implies adherence tothe oral philosophy. It is not a useful tool for language acquisition because while it may convey mechanical information, like the difference in the position of the speech producing anatomy in, for example, a "B" and a "P", it does not assist in conveying conceptual information. If a child does not get that conceptual information,they are uinable to internalize language, and therefore, are very mechanical in their usage.

Originally Posted by Cloggy

Not able to find that in any of the articles I found...... I found very positive results, especially when CS is used in combination with other tools and languages....
Can you provide some indication from where that comes from....

Originally Posted by jillio

First of all, that is not a direct quote from any article. Did you see " " around it? Secondly, it is a sythesis of numerous articles and books from which I have obtained my information. Once again, go to that book list in the thread you created, and you will possibly be able to do the same.