Quote:
Originally Posted by jag
Cued speech has been around for awhile. My guess is this is the advantage over ASL.
"Why is Cued Speech so successful? Hearing people use their knowledge of the sounds of English when they learn to cue. Deaf children brought up with Cued Speech work in the opposite way. They acquire an internal model of sound-based English through Cued Speech - even if they can't hear it. Once the implant gives them access to speech sounds these can be plotted onto the model of sound-based English they have already internalised. Belgian research - and many case studies - demonstrates that children brought up with Cued Speech can think in sound-based language.(4)
It is this visual access to sound-based language that enables a deaf child to acquire an understanding of spoken language without delay pre-implant and also uniquely primes the child for the acquisition of spoken language when it becomes available post implant. As Jane Smith, with her 20 years experience, said: `Cued Speech helps clarify and verify what is heard; it actually accelerates the learning of language and listening' "
|
Cued speech has been around for 40 years. For some time, it became almost nonexistent in use because it did not prove to accomplish the goals it proposed. It is now seeing a revival due to the number of children being implanted. I suspect that it will repeat the same history this time around.
And clarifying and verifying is what it it most suited to, as an adjuct to lipreading and not as a method of language acquisition. Internalization of langauge is what is neccesary, and if a child has been exposed to sign early on, andthus internalized the concept of language, that will facilitate the learning of a second language such as English.