NPR : Assessing Wikipedia's Accuracy
In this debate, Wikipedia is the equivalent of Chick Publications. Better find something better to support your argument.
"In the wake of questions of accuracy, a survey by the science journal Nature finds that science entries in the volunteer-driven, online encyclopedia Wikipedia are "not markedly less accurate" than those found in Encyclopaedia Britannica. Nature reporter Mark Peplow discusses the survey."
Translation: it's very accurate. Would they say the same for Chick Publication? No. It's full of hot air and full of opinions.