Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardbiker
I disagreed completely that VP-200 is shitty. NOTHING is 100% perfect, sure some VP-200 turns out to be defective, it does NOT mean it is shitty. Problem is that as right now VP-200 is small and when a person got defective VP-200 they would declare VP-200 SHITTY. Tell you this, there are plenty of VP-100 is defective as well. Nothing is perfect!
Whats difference between them?
As for network set up requirement... NO DIFFERENT! Same gateway, same everything.
As for features, VP-200 got much more features, some of them I found is not true...
|
That's what I assumed. Few of my friends got VP-200 and do have its share of problems as well. I think I better stick with VP-100 for a while till they debug the VP-200 problems and should be fine by then. As long my VP-100 works fine so why should I change when they offer me VP-200.
Only I do know that VP-200 features sure beat the old one.
I was told that Sorenson focus on VP-200 more while less with VP-100 to update and changes underway. That was what caused some server problems between VP callers few weeks ago. Also what Diehard said also contributed to both VP types some problems as well. Not perfect yet.. true!
I'm sure as time goes it will get better and better.