Quote:
liebling wrote:
Yes, itīs about revenge because Bush accussed Iraq for attack 9/11 and then sent his soliders to punish Iraq there and then later found out that Iraq is not responsible for 9/11. The world is furious with Bush for that because Americans and Iranians were being killed in Iraq for nothing. Do you still claim that itīs not revenge? Bush has no right to attack/kill people from other countries when thereīre no proof who did 9/11. First Bush accussed Hussein, now then Bin Laden...
|
I do agree w/you as I did watched the true story about it... Likey My god.. what Bush have done so many wrong ways.. which there's no proof...
Quote:
Where have Bush proof that itīs Hussein or Bin Laden who did 9/11? Bush sent his soliders to attack/kill people in Iraq without proof. The world told Bush to not do that but Bush ignored it. Now you see that Iraq is not responsible for 9/11? Nobody arrest Bush for the war criminal, he made against Iraq. Why?
If Bush want to have Bin Laden then do something, not sent solider to attack/kill innoncent people to get Hussein or Bin Laden.
|
Yeah, I still not understand why, Bush still running after them.. but happy captive Saddam... then what next ? Why Bush kept stubborn and contuine... Wha.. heck he doing... why he expense on war all the time and not look after the us country.. All he wants smell and goal to get OIL... (rolls)
Revenage isn't help solve the problem!