08-03-2006, 10:47 AM
|
#99 (permalink)
|
|
Hiiiiiii it's meeeeee
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 25,540
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Reba
That's the problem. Europeans see only the negative news about America, and the protests.
|
Remember, TV Media doesnīt lie. The film about them is an original. Americans were being interviewed by Reporters with film. Who negative? Of course, Bush himself because he doesnīt care about his own country. 
Quote:
|
They don't realize that the protesters are a very small percentage of the population. Protesting is more "newsworthy" so it gets more coverage. News about people supporting the military, or showing the positive things that happen, don't get covered because those stories are "boring."
|
Your Mom answered already. Your Mom is correct about this because she said the same what TV Medias said.
Quote:
War against terrorism is not a Republican issue, and war against terrorism is not about revenge. See, that's what I mean about not getting the whole story.
It's not about "revenge".
|
Yes, itīs about revenge because Bush accussed Iraq for attack 9/11 and then sent his soliders to punish Iraq there and then later found out that Iraq is not responsible for 9/11. The world is furious with Bush for that because Americans and Iranians were being killed in Iraq for nothing. Do you still claim that itīs not revenge? Bush has no right to attack/kill people from other countries when thereīre no proof who did 9/11. First Bush accussed Hussein, now then Bin Laden...
Quote:
|
If a surgeon cuts a tumor out of a patient's body to prevent the spread of cancer is that "revenge" against the patient? No. It's saving the life of the patient.
|
|
No I see different.
Surgeon has a proof that his patient has a cancer then do something is catch right cancer and then remove.... Itīs about save humanīs life. The cancer is the best proof, then they can save their patient life... What Bush did is total different because of no proof. He did not catch right one but kill them... *shake my head*
Where have Bush proof that itīs Hussein or Bin Laden who did 9/11? Bush sent his soliders to attack/kill people in Iraq without proof. The world told Bush to not do that but Bush ignored it. Now you see that Iraq is not responsible for 9/11? Nobody arrest Bush for the war criminal, he made against Iraq. Why?
If Bush want to have Bin Laden then do something, not sent solider to attack/kill innoncent people to get Hussein or Bin Laden.
If anyone who get revenge, always get it back... Look what they did to hurt innoncent people... All what I say is LEAVE OTHER COUNTRIES ALONE ... Get revenge is not worth... Bush should focus his own people, not revenge against other countries...
__________________
*sniffing you*
Last edited by Liebling:-))); 08-03-2006 at 11:03 AM.
|
|
|