03-13-2006, 03:34 PM
|
#132 (permalink)
|
|
Professional Writer.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Minnesota.
Posts: 3,216
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Reba
Assistance dogs are NOT "pets." They are trained to perform specific tasks.
Assistance dogs have access to facilities that "pets" do not. They are allowed in public buildings and transportation that pets are not allowed.
Just because some Deaf people don't need or want assistance dogs why criticize or restrict the choices of the Deaf people who DO want to use an assistance dog?
This is beginning to sound like another CI v. no-CI, oral v. ASL, etc., controversy. I don't understand why people just don't accept the fact that "one-size" DOESN'T fit all, and allow for a variety of choices, or even a combination of choices.
If even members of the Deaf community can't understand and support each other, how on earth do you expect the hearing world to understand or be supportive?
|
Reba, I concur. Some hoh/deaf don't want a dog or any other animal helping them, some do. There are about two environments that a service dog can't go into, but otherwise, they go everywhere.
__________________
Pete
|
|
|