View Single Post
Old 02-12-2006, 04:40 PM   #52 (permalink)
pek1
Professional Writer.
 
pek1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Minnesota.
Posts: 3,313
Send a message via AIM to pek1 Send a message via MSN to pek1 Send a message via Yahoo to pek1
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nesmuth
Guess what!

Even the deafs who run CISS.org better known as the Deaflympics coordinators do require audiograms before the deafs can play their games and the judges and their organizations are soo much exposed to CISS audiogram policies thanks to Rafael Pinchas lawsuit as it has done good to shock the judges pretty good and they seem to be following CISS's example with regards to the certification issue.

Richard

This is precisely the problem that is going on. Why are people, especially the deaf, insisting on "certification?" It tells the hearing world, "Okay, look, please...have pity on me, I have a hearing loss and I want you to like me and I'll be nice and do things your way." If this be the case, "Hearies" win, deaf lose. I've been there...letting hearies dictate...now I play hardball and love the rules...let me into the courtroom with the attorneys of my choice and they will be begging for mercy. The documents for the ADA need to stand on their own, exactly as they are stated and written, without some deaf people kissing off our rights, settling for what they want or settling out of court. Damn it, Richard, bring those bastards to their knees begging mercy from the deaf/hoh, it's time we did it!
__________________
Pete
pek1 is offline   Reply With Quote