View Single Post
Old 09-05-2005, 09:51 AM   #22 (permalink)
dkf747
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: DC Area
Posts: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardbiker65
No, not true that VP-100 were made specifically for relay!
FROM: http://www.sorensonvrs.com/company/index.php

"The company's Sorenson VP-100™ is the first consumer-based broadband videophone appliance specifically designed for deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. Sorenson IP Relay Service (www.siprelay.com) allows users to place text-based relay calls from a PC or mobile device to any standard telephone user."

Quote:
You could use VP-100 for any videoconferencing with just practically anyone who use H.232 protocol.
You can use it as a doorstop or as a paper weight as well. Doesn't mean it was designed for that purpose. I guess using big words like "designed" might throw you off the point. Sorenson makes its money from VRS, not when you use it for VP to VP videoconferencing. That's a feature of it, but is not it's main purpose.

Quote:
The only thing that VP-100 designs differ from Dlink was that it is programmed to use specifically ONE VRS provider, that is SorensonVRS. They have them blocked with other VRS provider. [
The other difference is in how they are marketed. The DVC-1000 is marketed to hearing people and corporations. It was also used by other VRS services to compete with Sorenson's product.

Sorenson designed the software for both the DVC-1000 and the VP-100. That's why Sorenson can add features while the competitors are left out in the cold. (Yes, that is an example of Monopoly power.)

Quote:
Sorenson have I think 3 patents on these device, while Dlink have 7 patents on them as well. Dlink is the manufacturer for these devices. Sorenson don't really owns whole thing at all.
from: http://www.sorenson.com/products/

" The Sorenson VP-100 and the D-Link i2eye videophones were both developed by Sorenson Communications. However, the Sorenson-branded videophone is designed specifically for the deaf community while the D-Link i2eye videophone is intended for the mass market. "

Sorenson does not own DLink, however, they do license the technology to DLink to sell. The same way a japanese built car can have Chevrolet's name on it.
dkf747 is offline   Reply With Quote