11-24-2011, 09:07 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,434
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oddball
I understand Amy's perspective about Sorenson.
However, I spoke with someone about ZVRS's illegal practice. A customer is interested in getting a Z20 phone and did fill out the application to receive a Z20 phone, but he or she was demanded to put his or her VP 200 phone number to port into Z20 phone. That customer felt that Z representative pushing him or her to jot down the number for porting purposes.
The purple representative backed off and respected customer's choice of VRS provider, but Z representative did not.
Are you being aware that Z representative removed a VP 200 and took it with him or her and left a customer a Z phone??? Is it all right? No. Z representative has no rights to take away VP 200 or other VRS provider device. If customer is not satisfied with other VRS provider device, then s/he can return the devices themselves.. Simple as that. Taking away a device from them?? No No.
Why not porting numbers from other VRS provider such as Purple, Convorelay, Viable, etc? Why does ZVRS focus on getting a port number from Sorenson only? Is it legal??? That bothers me.
I did get a porting number from Purple which I don't use to ZOJO (which I did not want). To the realization, I don't need ZOJO product and porting that number to Sorenson ntouch mobile and returned ZOJO product plus flasher back to Z because I never use ZOJO.
From what I find out more about ZVRS's actions, I lost respect for them. I use Convorelay and Sorenson products..that's it.
|
Look at sorensons history... I am disgusted by it. I only use Convo.
|
|
|