Originally Posted by kuifje75
I think everybody's definition of marriage is different. Not all couples marry so that they can have children. Some couples do get married, but decide not to have children. Does that mean that marriage is not for them?
and let's not forget the "Christian" married couples who goes through "Unnatural" process in order to get pregnant.
Fertilizing eggs in a science lab is not natural because it is not done through a sex intercourse.
What about the infertile couples since they cannot produce children, so how is the purpose of marriage served?
Yet, you call homosexual sex activities unnatural when in fact many heterosexual couples do it the same way.
Sodomy is done by MANY heterosexual couples. So it is really no difference from homosexual sex activities.
When you think about it, we are really just made up of organs but we are able to think on our own. A penis get inserted into an anus, and this applies to both heterosexuality and homosexuality. How is it "unnatural" when it has been proven that people get orgasms by having anal sex due to the prostate getting pressed on?
Sorry, but I don't see how it is unnatural as a sex activity. But in order to "reproduce", you will have to go with a penis and a vagina to achieve it.
But homosexual couples can always find a male donor or a female willing to carry the baby... or they go go to the adoption centres.
But of course, too many adoption centres are biased when it come to sexual orientation.
It is also unfair that gay couples get denied their rights when it come to hospital visits, benefits, etc, etc simply because it is frowned upon on from the society.