View Single Post
Old 07-01-2009, 12:47 AM   #32 (permalink)
TechBill
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 838
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etoile View Post
My guess is that Point To Point is an FCC term and that is why everybody uses it instead of Deaf to Deaf. The FCC probably uses it to mean any call that doesn't involve a TRS operator.

But the question is ....

Are Sorenson breaking a rule if a Deaf user use VP200 and call SnapVRS but SnapVRS operator cannot see the Caller ID from VP200?


Calling Purple or SnapVRS or CDVRS still involes TRS relay and yet they are blocked access to VP200 Caller ID function when Deaf user use it to make relay call with Sorenson's device with other reply provider.

Follow what I am saying?


And it sound like to me that Sorenson said that since they claim to have VP out first "VP100" so the standard should be set by Sorenson not by other providers and other providers need to follow Sorsenson's standard that they set because they had it out first years ago.




.
TechBill is online now   Reply With Quote