02-13-2009, 01:05 PM
|
#308 (permalink)
|
|
Sussi *7.7.86 - 18.6.09*
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 31,038
|
[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reba
Why just you? Because you are the one posting here who complains about her boss. They aren't. Also, Americans have the right to vote out the leaders with whom they disagree. Also, paying taxes is required by law. Working "for the man" is not.
|
No, I am not the one who view Bush´s situation. It´s not just here but there in MANY threads - A lot of Aders complaint about Bush... Why can´t I share my support to them and also mine as well then? You pick on me that´s because I am not an American. It show itself is your feeble excuse.
Quote:
|
Paying taxes to the government is not the same as accepting money from the government.
|
Oh yes, they accept the money from government is SSI, SSDA, medicard, etc. thru taxpayers..
I repeat my response post to your post stay remain.
Quote:
Trying to deflect my question so you don't have to give an honest answer won't work.
Some ADers have posted that. They posted, "if America is so wrong, you can leave." But how does that excuse what you do?
See above.
|
Your feeble excuse to twist is not working... See above...
Quote:
|
Do they have proof who caused the injuries, when they caused, under what circumstances were they caused, and where they were caused? No.
|
I use common sense to see their scars on TV and also pictures, video... that´s why I kept quiet during GITMO debate threads since 2004 because I do not want to accuse anything until I saw the proof... and beleive in them because they repeated the same for YEARS since 9/11.
Quote:
I'm very sorry about your awful experience but what does that have to do with the detainees? Do you compare yourself to war-time terrorists detainees? I wouldn't make that comparison.
The only relevancy I can see is that your situation shows that it is hard to make a case on the basis of scars. A scar by itself, without other forensic corroboration or testimony is not enough to prove a case.
|
I shared the example about my scars - the court beleive "witness" more than my scar, doctor´s and work council´s statement because they were not witnesses. That witness, my former boss got was NEVER exist where my former boss & I were alone in my office with door shut. The former boss denied that he attacked me to get a paper with the help from "witness"´s statement and never know about the paper... Secondly, the paper, I want to forward chain of command disappeared because my former boss had it... (Of course he throw the paper away). They moved me to other Division after I lost at court case, that same Division I still work since... 6 months later after that he was fired for fraud... that´s why I use my good common sense when I see scars... I know what form of cigarettes burnt, dog bites, etc...
__________________
|
|
|