Originally Posted by Daredevel7

Let me if I get this straight.. if there were no animal testing, your mom's cancer would have had a better chance of getting cured? Not seeing the reasoning here. You don't believe in animal testing? Fine I accept that, but I don't see how it INTERFERES or DELAYS with the process of curing cancer? I don't like animal testing much but only a handful of people will do experimental testing, and it simply is not as efficient as testing 100 hamsters at the same time for 100 different possible cures. When it comes to finding cures, I am for animal testing. But if it comes to "Let's see if this shampoo is bad for the skin!", screw you, test it on yourself.