09-29-2008, 09:12 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Let It Snow!!!!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: A place where crabs are popular
Posts: 40,294
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClearSky
I voted no, but I don't believe that ASL helps literacy in a great way.
I think children should use SEE in schools and home. Socially use ASL. They are young, and they can pick up on SEE as it is in books and English language. Even though, deaf children will take awhile to pick up on the language, and that's normal because they're not picking up language by hearing everyone out there. If people think they can do ASL, so they can do SEE. I think the deaf community is just afraid that ASL will disappear. I think that ASL is always learned by many people later as an adult when they know English first. ASL, I think, should be like a second language. I think that the saying that ASL is their natural language is bullcrap, and it says to me that people don't believe in them to learn the English language first hand.
That's my opinion and only my opinion.
|
I respect your opinion but I see the opposite daily as a teacher for the deaf.
__________________
 "Wine improves with age. The older I get, the better I like it."
--- Anonymous
|
|
|