AllDeaf.com - View Single Post

Liebling:-))) · 06-24-2008, 12:39 PM

[QUOTE]

Quote:

Originally Posted by jiro123

I have warned you many times to choose your word carefully. You are on borderline of greatly insulting men and women of uniform especially those you work with. Watada was not ordered to shoot the innocent person nor has ever ordered anybody to do so. He was ORDERED to deploy to Iraq and he won't even do the office duty! PLEASE STICK TO FACTS - NOT INSULTING SPECULATION.

I do not see anything that my word is an insult but question. Please re-read my post carefully... Example: Would you do if a general tell you to shoot the innocent person?. Is "question an insult? No, if you accuse something wrongly then is an insult. I do not insult but ASK you QUESTION. You call Watada as a coward is an insult because you ACCUSED him, not QUESTION him. Get the difference?

I use the example to ASK you question because of your previous posts... You repeated to say that Watada broke the oath, contract, etc. and must obey the order, etc. and then call him coward for say no. I repeated you that Watada has the right to say no to the order when he felt it´s wrong. You denied and keep saying that Watada is wrong... coward, etc. That´s an exactly why I tried to tell you that we can say NO.

Quote:

Quote from CBS News - "Estimates say there are between 100 and 250 of them." And that is many? no it's just a few cowards who did not want to be redeployed and ran away to Canada. It's simple. The pollsters do not think objectively. They were only thinking about their sons and daughters in Iraq. It's typical of Americans to lose support for war if it takes 3+ years. Most of our wars lasted about 3 years or less.

Conclusion: The longer the war is, the less popular it gets. Plain and simple.

To me, 100 or 250 to Canada is many but other link says different.

Canada court: AWOL U.S. soldiers not refugees - Conflict in Iraq - MSNBC.com