06-21-2008, 08:11 AM
|
#65 (permalink)
|
|
Sussi *7.7.86 - 18.6.09*
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 30,971
|
[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiro123
personal experience and personal knowledge cannot be used to present the case in debate.
|
Yes, we can because we shares their own experience to know what and how it doing and can say something difference. You can´t ignore someone´s experience to beleive in websites only. Each website have different knowledge and opinion, some Fact and some opinion. I beleive in real life experience situation and original than the medias from any websites written. I am not saying that website is false but they write their own view, knowledge and opinion. I often see 3 or 4 websites to against each other over "fact". I have one Ader who PMed me about his/her experience to work for US Army as well. She/He rather to share real life experience with me privacy than public post because her/his experiences had been denied in the past and beleive websites more than her/his experiences. I do not have to tell everything what I know them in real life but share some. Anyone need to open their mind to listen both side, not one side. I would not post if I don´t have any experiences.
Quote:
|
That testimony is usually weak if there's no evidence to back it up. Byrdie as the former lawyer knows this already and so do all lawyers. in court - byrdie would be using previous cases which is called "a legal precedent" for stronger support and a rock-solid witness's testimony - the more, the better especially if overwhelming number of the testimonies are told by high-level officials.
|
We also have our own experience to have lawyers in the past.  As lawyer, he/she listen both side to the law and client before advise/recommend/explain to clients. Of course lawyer can write a letter to miltary or contracter to ask something for clarify and deal. If Miltary or contractor agreed then add something in writing on the contract. I can ask contracter to add something to fix the agreement contract... It´s my experience.  For Brylie, he as former lawyer should take both sides to listen, not one side but he took only one side... 
Quote:
|
No. You confuse "ignoring their own law" with Executive Orders or special bills passed by Congress (ie. Patriot Acts). The President can temporarily issue an order that overrides the law such as Martial Law.
|
No you don´t understand... The fact, they can ignore the law if they wish. I am not saying that the law could be ignore all the time but sometimes. one ADer and I know real life experience because we both work for US Army.
Quote:
|
I've repeatedly told you to carefully choose your words. If you want to make a statement like "ignored their own law sometimes" - then you need to prove it. .
|
I am sorry that you don´t want to see but it´s really truth that we all including Government, Employer, doctor, etc ignore/violate/obey the law. Yes it´s a fact.
Quote:
Otherwise it makes you look like  - a some conspiracy theorist or a reporter for tabloid newspaper
|
Very interesting, you quoted to insult me as but , therorist, reporter, tabloid, etc. and said nothing to immaturity posts to insult soliders as coward, chicken, etc.   I´m very disappoint in you. It´s bad if you don´t like or refuse to open your mind to see both sides to real life experiences and websites. Don´t you know that there´re freedom of speech and use good common sense in AllDeaf Forum Rules?
__________________
|
|
|