personal experience and personal knowledge cannot be used to present the case in debate. That testimony is usually weak if there's no evidence to back it up. Byrdie as the former lawyer knows this already and so do all lawyers. in court - byrdie would be using previous cases which is called "a legal precedent" for stronger support and a rock-solid witness's testimony - the more, the better especially if overwhelming number of the testimonies are told by high-level officials.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liebling:-)))
Jiro123, yes I know the law but the Government ignored their own law sometimes. Yes, the links could be deny sometimes. You can beleive what you want and think Government follow the law correct. Really truth, it could be manpiulate sometimes.
|
No. You confuse "ignoring their own law" with Executive Orders or special bills passed by Congress (ie. Patriot Acts). The President can temporarily issue an order that overrides the law such as Martial Law.
I've repeatedly told you to carefully choose your words. If you want to make a statement like "ignored their own law sometimes" - then you need to prove it. Otherwise it makes you look like
- a some conspiracy theorist or a reporter for tabloid newspaper.